Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brown v. County Commissioners

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 17, 1995No. 61Published

1DissentRodowsky, Judge

I respectfully dissent because I agree with the conclusion reached by the Attorney General of Maryland in 75 Op. Att’y Gen. 1101 (1990) [Opinion No. 90-034 (July 5, 1990) ]. There the Attorney General ruled that federal Medicaid benefits are not payable to detainees, whether pretrial, during trial, post-verdict, or post-judgment of conviction. Because there is no longer even partial federal reimbursement for inmate medical care, federal reimbursement cannot be a condition precedent to a detainee’s statutory obligation to make restitution.

It may be helpful to the reader if the pieces of this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Revere v. Massachusetts General HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Lerch v. Maryland Port AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. In Re Formal Inquiry Concerning Judge BennettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Brown v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API