Legal Opinion
Goulah v. Ford Motor Company
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided August 7, 1997No. 96-2678PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAY, Senior Circuit Judge:
James and Nancy Goulah, residents of the State of Florida, filed this products liability action against Ford Motor Company, a Delaware corporation, alleging that defects in, and the negligent design of the Ford Bronco II caused the Goulahs to sustain serious injuries in a rollover accident. After a three week trial, the jury returned a verdict for Ford. Plaintiffs now appeal the trial court’s admission and exclusion of various pieces of evidence and the court’s refusal to give several requested jury instructions, including an instruction on comparative negligence. We…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hoffman v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- United States v. Evans H. Starke, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Pesaplastic, C.A. v. Cincinnati Milacron Co., Tedruth Plastics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Marjetta Wilkinson v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Lisa Beth JUDD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dennis RODMAN, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dunbar v. Pepsi-Cola General Bottlers of Iowa, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003
- 47 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 720, prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 15,059, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 283 James Goulah, Husband, Nancy Goulah, Wife, Ajodhia Dabydeen, Etc. v. Ford Motor Company, a Foreign Corporation, Eris, Inc., MovantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997