Legal Opinion
Oldroyd v. Kugler
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 17, 1970No. Civ. A. 1002-70PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
2Per curiam
We have before us a motion on behalf of the defendants to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction because plaintiffs have failed to show irreparable injury; because they have an adequate remedy under State law; because they have failed to exhaust their available State remedies; because this court does not have jurisdiction to enjoin State court criminal proceedings where there is as here an adequate remedy at law; because the complaint fails to state a claim on which relief can be granted as no violation by defendants of any legal right of plaintiffs has been shown;…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Zwickler v. KootaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Street v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Halter v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- Thoms v. HeffernanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Kenneth Oldroyd v. George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney General and Chief Prosecutor of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Commonwealth v. GoguenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Oldroyd v. KuglerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1973
- State v. ZimmelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.