Legal Opinion

Di Battista v. Centennial Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 28, 1964No. Gen. 10,536PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

A question of procedure is involved. Defendants, both fire insurance companies, appeal from an order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. The pleadings are a thicket. They are: (1) Plaintiff’s complaint alleging coverage and loss; (2) plaintiff’s interrogatories; (3) defendants’ objections to same; (4) plaintiff’s amended interrogatories; (5) defendants’ objections to same; (6) defendants’ interrogatories; (7) verified answer; (8) plaintiff’s motion to strike same; (9) plaintiff’s answer to interrogatories; (10) defendants’ motion to strike certain answers; (11) plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Solone v. ReckAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  2. Sampson Co. v. Mandel Bros., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  3. Midwest Grocery Co. v. DannoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smiley v. Manchester Insurance & Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  2. Patterson v. SternAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  3. Glen View Club v. BeckerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  4. McVey v. DischerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  5. Williams v. City of BloomingtonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API