Legal Opinion
Bauer v. Facilities Development Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 23, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendants’ motions for change of venue. Subdivision (1) of section 12 of the Facilities Development Corporation Act (L 1968, ch 359, § 1, as amended; McKinney’s Uncons Laws of NY § 4412 [1]) provides, in pertinent part, that "[t]he venue of any action, suit or special proceeding brought against the corporation shall be laid in the county of Albany.” To prevent the transfer of the action, plaintiffs were required to make a cross motion to retain venue in Monroe County for the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zinker v. ZinkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Pitegoff v. LuciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Bruder v. Pepsi Cola, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Seaboard Surety Co. v. Facilities Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Braver v. County of Nassau Office of Administrative ServicesNew York Supreme Court · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harvard Steel Sales, LLC v. BainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- In re City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2005
- International Fidelity Insurance v. Perosi Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Mancuso v. Facilities Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994