Sheafe v. Zastrow
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal front Circuit Court, Day County. Hon. Frank Mc-Nurty, Judge. Action by M. W. S'heafe against August Zastr-o-w, to recover ■balance of purchase price of a heating plant. From a judgment for plaintiff and- an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.
Read the full summary
Appeal front Circuit Court, Day County. Hon. Frank Mc-Nurty, Judge. Action by M. W. S'heafe against August Zastr-o-w, to recover ■balance of purchase price of a heating plant. From a judgment for plaintiff and- an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals. Under the terms of Exhibit A, the contract of -purchase, it is expressly warranted and agreed that all work is to be done in a workmanlike manner and that -material used is not defective and that' the furnace is to be of sufficient size to heat the lower floor to a temperature of 70 degrees and the upper floor to a temperature of 60…
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This is an appeal by defendant from a directed verdict in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial. The complaint alleges, in substance: That the defendant requested the plaintiff to install a certain heating plant in the defendant’s house -in the town of Waubay. That, upon such request, the plaintiff did the work and furnished the material as agreed, and that the heating plant was of the reasonable value of $320. That the defendant has paid $150 upon the purchase price of the same, and demands recovery of the balance due upon the purchase price.
The contract under which the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Massillon Engine & Thresher Co. v. ShirmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- McConnell v. LewisNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
- Acme Harvesting Machine Co. v. BarkleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by2 opinions
- Miller v. MartySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
- Slinger v. TottenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917