Feiertag v. Feiertag

For a statement of this case, we refer to *490Feiertag v. Feiertag, 73 Mich. 297. This Court then held that there was sufficient testimony to go to the jury under the count for money had and received; but the case was reversed for errors, and a new trial ordered, with a suggestion to the plaintiff's attorney to apply to the court for leave to amend his bill of particulars.

Instead of amending his bill of particulars, the attorney obtained leave and amended his declaration, averring that the defendant was indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $2,770 for money paid by the plaintiff to the…