Legal Opinion

Kyu Chang Yoon v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 21, 1998PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendant’s water and sewer tax bills are invalid, the plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Colar, J.), entered July 1,1997, which dismissed the action as time-barred by the four-month Statute of Limitations set forth in CPLR 217.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The instant action is time-barred (see, 45435 Realty Co. v City of New York, 200 AD2d 501; Renley Dev. Co. v Town Bd., 106 AD2d 717; Matter of Miller v McGough, 97 AD2d 416). Bracken, J. P.,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. McGoughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Renley Development Co. v. Town Board of Town of KirkwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. 45435 Realty Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. 184 Kent Avenue Associates v. MieleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API