Legal Opinion
Cuneo v. City of Chicago
Illinois Supreme Court
Decided September 24, 1948No. Nos. 30318, 30319. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
This is a suit at law to recover just compensation for damage to property under section 13 of article II of the constitution of Illinois. The plaintiff, Cuneo, is the owner of property situated at the northeast corner of Michigan Avenue and Randolph Street in the city of Chicago and by his complaint alleges that his property was damaged by reason of the changes made in the grades of adjoining streets when the Illinois Central suburban railroad station and the approach for a new viaduct in Randolph Street in front of his property were constructed. The cause was tried in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kane v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
- Osgood v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Cuneo v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
- McCoy v. Union Elevated RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
- Cuneo v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
3Cited by11 opinions
- Department of Public Works & Buildings v. Exchange National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Bistline v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Department of Public Works & Buildings v. FinksIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
- Unger v. Nunda Township Rural Fire Protection DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Illinois State Toll Highway Authority v. Humphrey EstateAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.