Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Armstrong Capital Corp.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided November 30, 1995No. 01-94-01271-CVPublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MIRABAL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in a forcible detainer action. Because there was an unresolved title dispute, involving the same parties and same property, pending in the District Court at the time of this forcible detainer action, we hold that jurisdiction over this action was defeated. Accordingly, we reverse and render.

The following facts are uncontroverted. On November 7, 1986, appellant, Daisy Mae Mitchell, executed a “Builder’s and Mechanic’s Lien Contract” covering her property at 7015 Castleview, Missouri City, Texas, to secure payment of a $34,378.80…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Haith v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. American Spiritualist Ass'n v. RavkindCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  3. Gentry v. MarburgerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Dent v. PinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. Rodriguez v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Rice v. Pinney, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
  2. Dormady v. Dinero Land & Cattle Co., LC, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
  3. Ward v. Malone, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  4. Aguilar v. Weber, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2002
  5. Falcon v. Ensignia, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API