Legal Opinion

Hoeffner v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 9, 1898No. 985PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri.

1Opinion of the Court

SHIRAS, District Judge.

Prom the record in this case, it appears that on the 8th day of August, 1896, the plaintiff in error en-. feral into a recognizance, in the sum of $3,000, conditioned that; one Charles P. Knowlton, who had been indicted in the United States district court for the Eastern district of Missouri for a criminal violation of section 5480 of the Revised Statutes of the United States, should personally appear before said court on the first day of the November term, 1896, and continue in attendance until discharged according to law; this recognizance being entered into before a…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. LouisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1906
  2. Hoeffner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  3. Opinion No. Oag 36-76, (1976), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1976
  4. Safford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  5. United States v. McGeeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API