Legal Opinion

Louisville Extension Water Dist. v. Sloss

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 26, 1951PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMMACK, Chief Justice.

The appellee, Robert L. Sloss, attorney at law, filed this action against the appellants, the Louisville Extension . Water District and its Board of Water Commissioners, Frank J. Murphy, Ambrose Hager-man and Arthur J. Steilberg, in their official capacity to recover $1,000 as a fee for services rendered in organizing the water district in 1942 and for certain services rendered thereafter. The appellants’ demurrer to the petition and petition as amended was overruled. The appellants filed answer, which was traversed 'by a reply. Upon the completion of the proof for both…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Worrell Manufacturing Co. v. City of AshlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  2. City of Owensboro v. WeirCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
  3. Farmers Bank v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  4. Gugenheim v. City of MarionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Town of Worland v. Odell & JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Arctic Slope Native Ass'n v. PaulAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. City of Greenup v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2005
  4. Quick v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1980
  5. Worden v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API