Legal Opinion

County of Monroe v. City of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 20, 2007PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeals from a judgment (denominated judgment and order) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Craig J. Doran, A.J.), entered July 6, 2006 in a declaratory judgment action. The judgment declared, inter alia, that, in the event that plaintiff elects the sales tax intercept option codified in Tax Law § 1261 (f), the *1273net collections distributed to defendants pursuant to Tax Law former § 1262-g would be reduced by the amount of sales tax revenue deducted by the State to cover plaintiffs Medicaid contribution.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. CareyNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Cuomo v. Long Island Lighting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Ballard v. HSBC BANK USANew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Herzog Bros. Trucking, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Hollows At Loch Lea Ass'n v. Town of ClarenceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Monroe County Public School Districts v. ZyraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. State v. Maurice G.New York Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. MercadoNew York Supreme Court · 2015
  4. In re Travis Y.New York City Family Court · 2010
  5. In re Kaminski G.New York City Family Court · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API