Legal Opinion

Vaught v. East Tennessee & W. N. C. Ry. Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall

The petitioner, Will Vaught, filed his petition in the law court at Johnson City, Tenn., against East Tennessee & Western North Carolina Railway Company, seeking compensation under the workmen’s compensation statute (chapter 123, Acts of .1919) for an injury sustained by him in January, 1922, while in the employ of defendant, and which injury arose out of and in the course of his employment.

Defendant answered the petition, setting up the following defenses:

First. It was denied that petitioner’s injury arose out of and in the course of his employment.

Second. That defendant ivas an interstate…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Erie Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Lehigh Valley Railroad v. BarlowSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. New York Central Railroad v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  2. Saunders v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Williams v. Carolina, Clinchfield & Ohio Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Tennessee Cent. Ry. Co. v. PyleTennessee Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API