Legal Opinion

Hess v. Final

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1875PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal in Chancery from Saginaw Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Cooley, j:

The objections to the rulings of the court in matters of practice we cannot review hero. None of them affected the merits; and appeals would be impediments instead of aids to justice if after a case had been fully heard on the facts, the appellate court could reverse the proceedings for what was only a technical error in the court below in some matter pertaining only to regularity in practice.

The principal error complained of is, that the court overruled a demurrer to a supplemental bill which brought into the case only such facts as should have been the subject of an amendment. But…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lockwood v. BeckwithMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Hale v. HolmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bradtfeldt v. CookeOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Gunderman v. GunnisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Sessions v. SherwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Salladin v. MitchellNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Cool v. SnoverMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API