Legal Opinion

Teague v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 9, 1942No. 8937PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

The appellant, a fireman employed by the Gulf, Mobile & Northern Railroad Company, conceiving his seniority rights as an employee of the Railroad to have been impaired by reason of an unlawful agreement between the Railroad and the Brotherhood, the collective bargaining agent of his craft, brought the present suit in the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, for himself and others of his class, to set aside the agreement, seeking injunction, discovery, restoration of seniority rights, damages and other relief. The bill was dismissed for want…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Shulthis v. McDougalSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Puerto Rico v. Russell & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. James v. Marinship Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. United States v. DionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  3. Barnhart v. Western Maryland Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
  4. Shipley v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Hanson v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1955

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API