Legal Opinion

Broadwater v. Courtney

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 23, 1991No. 70152PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Justice:

Plaintiff/appellant, a Tulsa realtor, showed a house to a prospective buyer and his son. The house was to be purchased through HUD and the realtor commission paid by HUD. Upon representations of the buyer’s son, plaintiff made preparations on behalf of the buyer to make an offer to HUD for the house.

Thereafter the buyer’s son phoned the defendant/appellee, also a Tulsa realtor, informed her that plaintiff had shown the buyer and him the house, that plaintiff was in preparation to make an offer, and asked what kind of deal defendant could make. Defendant assured the son that she…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Abel v. TisdaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Puckett v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  3. Ionic Petroleum, Limited v. Third Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. State Ex Rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. Finnell v. SeismicSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. Spencer v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  5. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Vinita v. KisseeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API