Legal Opinion

Steele v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 1, 1991No. 90-00613PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm the defendant’s numerous convictions and sentences.

We disagree with the defendant’s contention that his probationary split sentence of twelve years imprisonment followed by three years probation was improper. See Poore v. State, 531 So.2d 161 (Fla.1988).

In case number 89-276, we strike the fine imposed pursuant to section 775.0835, Florida Statutes (1987), because there was no showing of the statutory requirement that the offenses involved resulted in the injury or death to the victim.

Affirmed, as modified by this opinion.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Poore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Morran v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995