Legal Opinion

Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 382 v. Utah Transit Authority

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided September 10, 2004No. 20020764-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENCH, Associate Presiding Judge:

T1 Utah Transit Authority (UTA) appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of Amalgamated Transit Union (the Union) and Caroline Jolley-Christensen (Christensen). We reverse and remand.

BACKGROUND 1

T2 In April 1999, the Union and UTA entered into a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) that would run through December 2008. Article 7 of the CBA specifically addresses probation and termination of new employees:

All employees shall be on probation until they have worked one hundred ten (110) days. During such period UTA is the sole judge of ability,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beaver v. Qwest, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Kouris v. Utah Highway PatrolUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction, Inc. v. West Jordan CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Powell v. CannonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Hicks v. UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2010
  3. Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc. v. William Hamilton Smythe, III, Individually William H. Smythe, IV, Trust U/A/DTD 12/29/87, William H. Smythe, III, Trustee and Smythe Children's Trust 2 FBO Katherine S. Thinnes U/A/DTD 12/29/87Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API