Legal Opinion

North v. Wendell

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1868PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR to tbe Circuit Court for Fond du Lac County. Tbe action below was by Wendell against North ; and tbe latter seeks in tbis suit to reverse a judgment against bim. Tbe case is stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

Tbis was an action 'for a breach of the covenants in a warranty deed, the plaintiff claiming to bave been ousted under a paramount title. Tbis title depended on the validity of a certain tax deed given by Brown coud ty to one Eastman; and the court instructed the jury tbat the evidence showed tbat.it was a good title, which was excepted to. We bave at the present term, decided, in the case of Krueger v. Knab [ante, p. 429], tbat when the form of a tax deed prescribed by the statute clearly contemplates tbat the name of the purchaser shall be stated, and tbat if there has been an assignment,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eaton v. LymanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Hunt v. StinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Washburn Land Co. v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Herbst v. Land & Loan Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Dunbar v. LindsayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API