Legal Opinion

United States v. Warble

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 28, 1961No. 14,686PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

2Per curiam

The issues in this case relate to the sufficiency of specifications to allege, respectively, perjury and subornation of perjury. The perjury specification alleges that having taken a lawful oath in a summary court-martial to testify truly, the accused did “willfully, corruptly, and contrary to such oath” testify to certain material matters “which he did not then believe to be true.” Each of the two subornation specifications alleges that the accused procured an airman to commit perjury by inducing him to take an oath in a summary court-martial that he would testify truly…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. ChaneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. WilliamsArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API