Fucigna v. O'Connor
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMamo Pittoxi, J.
By this proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, the petitioner seeks an order in the nature of a mandamus for the issuance of certain building permits, asserting that provisions of the Town of North Hempstead Zoning Ordinance dictating such refusal are, as to the petitioner’s premises, arbitrary, unreasonable and unconstitutional.
The property involved has a frontage of 191 feet on its northerly side which is the southerly boundary of the Biverhead Expressway now in the process of construction. Its frontage on Willis Avenue is 383 feet. The frontage on the southerly boundary…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of Larkin Co. v. SchwabNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Evanns v. GunnNew York Supreme Court · 1940
- Evanns v. GunnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fucigna v. SahmNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Meisenzahl v. McAvoyNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. DerisonLong Beach City Court · 1968