Legal Opinion

Reardon v. Olympic Theatre Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment and order reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event on the ground that prejudicial errors occurred: 1. In the refusal to charge the final request of defendant. (New York Life Insurance Company v. Casey, 178 N. Y. 381.) (See Germania Life Insurance Company v. Casey, 98 App. Div. 88; affd., 184 N. Y. 554.) 2. In the refusal to leave to the jury the question of the sufficiency of the notice of dishonor. (Latham v. Sheff, 193 App. Div. 576; Union Bank v. Deshel, 139 id. 217.) (See Cuming v. Roderick, 28 id. 253; affd., 167 N. Y. 571.)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. New York Life Ins. Co. v. . CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Germania Life Insurance v. CaseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. Germania Life Insurance Company v. . CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Cuming v. . RoderickNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Latham v. SheffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Trusts & Guarantee Co. v. BarnhardtNew York Court of Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API