Legal Opinion

Santiago v. Tulane University Hospital & Clinic

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 2013No. 2012-CA-1095PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDRA CABRINA JENKINS, Judge.

12Plaintiff, Luz Santiago, appeals a district court ruling sustaining the Peremptory Exception of Peremption in favor of defendants, Dr. Robert L. Barrack, Dr. Scott Montgomery, Dr. Michael Adams, Dr. Sujal Shah, Dr. Brian Rogers, and their employer, the Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund (hereinafter, “Administrators”). At issue is whether or not the trial court erred in dismissing all of the plaintiffs claims against these defendants as untimely.

For the reasons assigned below, the trial court’s judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part. In…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Corsey v. State, Through Dept. of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. LeBreton v. RabitoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  3. Hebert v. Doctors Memorial Hosp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  4. Borel v. YoungSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  5. Giroir v. South Louisiana Medical Center, Division of HospitalsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bayou Fleet, Inc. v. Bollinger Shipyards, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. State v. Teva Pharm. Indus., Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  3. In re Medical Review Panel of HurstLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Gereighty v. DomingueLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  5. In re BenoitLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API