Legal Opinion

First Trust & Savings Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 1, 1925No. 24,634PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

This is the third appearance here of the case. It is reported in 156 Minn. 231, 194 N. W. 376, and 161 Minn. 88, 200 N. W. 848. John E. Leak was appointed administrator of the estate of Eobert Peterman, deceased, by the probate court of Winona county, and defendant became his bondsman. On petition Leak was removed and required to make a final accounting. He filed an account; a hearing thereon was had; and by an order of June 23, 1922, after the allowance of certain credits, the court charged him “with the sum of ten thousand sixteen and 21/100 dollars ($10,016.21) the amount of the funds and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pierce v. MaetzoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Gallagher v. Irish-American BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Chase v. WhittenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  4. Tomlinson v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  5. Balch v. HooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Neujahr v. NeujahrNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. National Surety Corporation of New York v. EllisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  3. Palmi v. PalmiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Barrett v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. F. Tru. Sav. Bk. v. U.S. Fid. Gua.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API