Legal Opinion

Pencil v. Home Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1892No. 309PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

The third paragraph of the complaint alleged the issuance of the policy, by the appellant, and gave its *487date, number, amount, property insured, time, and premium paid; and the seventh alleged performance of all the conditions contained therein by the respondent. The first error assigned is the admission of the policy in evidence at the trial “because the plaintiff declares upon an unconditional policy of insurance, while the policy offered in evidence is a conditional one.” The case here is precisely like that of Clark v. Phœnix Ins. Co., 36…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clark v. Phœnix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Walker v. McNeillWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Mcnamee v. MorelandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  3. Loy v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Morrison v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Bailey v. Tacoma Traction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API