Legal Opinion

Sibert v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1917No. Docket No. 147PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne; Brown, J,, presiding. Case by Catherine Sibert against the Detroit United Railway for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

Plaintiff claims, and offered testimony to support the claim, that, accompanied by her *119daughter, she attempted to board one of defendant’s cars, as a passenger, had placed one foot upon the step of a folding step car, when the doors were closed, the step folded, and by reason of some of her clothing catching in the door, or on the car, and her hold upon the car, she was dragged a distance, thrown to the pavement, and injured. No one precisely disputed her testimony. The defense, which was good enough to secure a verdict of the jury for defendant, may be described as based: (1) Upon the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Winnett v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Parkside Housing ProjectMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Green v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. City of Detroit v. VandenbrokerMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API