Horton v. Horton
New York Supreme Court
Action for partition.
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
This action is for the partition of certain real property in Suffolk county and involves the con*686struction of the will o£ Nannie W. H. Conklin. The clause of the will which is in controversy is as follows: “All the rest of my property real and personal I give one-half to my nephew Phil H. Horton, and one-half to my great-nephew Henry D. Horton, Jr., unless he dies before twenty-one or without family then his part goes to my great-nephew Philip Goldsmith Horton. It is my wish and desire that the old Homestead together with the property across the street be retained in the Horton family as long…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Scott v. . GuernseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Stokes v. . WestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Roome v. . PhillipsNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Jackson ex dem. Burhans v. BlanshanNew York Supreme Court · 1810
- Scott v. GuernseyNew York Supreme Court · 1866
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Accounting of GordonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1944