Legal Opinion

Great Western Telegraph Co. v. Burnham

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1891PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Milwaukee County. The defendants demurred to the complaint, and appeal from an order overruling their demurrer. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion. Among other things, they argued that the assessment was unequal and void; and that the Illinois court, in respect to assessments,, merely took the place of the directors, and could only make a pro rata assessment. Ha/wloins v. Qlerm, 131 TJ.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Milwaukee County. The defendants demurred to the complaint, and appeal from an order overruling their demurrer. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion. Among other things, they argued that the assessment was unequal and void; and that the Illinois court, in respect to assessments,, merely took the place of the directors, and could only make a pro rata assessment. Ha/wloins v. Qlerm, 131 TJ. S. 333; Lamb v. Lamb, 6 Biss. 424; Stewart v. Lay, 45 Iowa, 612; Bangs v. JDuehinfield, 18 N. Y. 598. They argued, among other things, that if the Illinois court…

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed December 16, 1890:

Cole, C. J.

This action was brought against George Burnham in his life-time, and, after his death, was revived against the executors of his will. The action is upon a contract of subscription to the capital stock of the plaintiff corporation. It appears from the complaint that Burnham, in May, 1869, subscribed for and agreed to take 100 shares of the capital stock, and pay for the same as follows: five per cent, of the par value down, and the balance of the par value — to wit, $25 upon each share so subscribed for — from time to time as the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pike v. Bangor & Calais Shore Line RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1878

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Parker v. Stoughton Mill Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Hale v. McCammon Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Davis v. Parcher & J. & A. Stewart Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Seyberth v. American Commander Mining & Milling Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1926
  5. McCall v. BowenNebraska Supreme Court · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API