Legal Opinion
Estey v. Susquehanna Pipeline Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 31, 1950PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSearl, J.
Plaintiffs have for many years been the owners of a farm located in the town of Tully, Onondaga County, New York. In December, 1947, Sun Pipeline Company, Inc., was merged into Susquehanna Pipeline Company, Inc., and assumed any and all liability of the former company. For convenience, defendant and its predecessor will be termed “ the company.”
In 1931, the company was installing a pipe line for the conveyance of gasoline from Marcus Hook, -Pennsylvania, to the Barge Canal Terminal outside the western limits of the city of Syracuse. On the 15th day of January, 1931, an agreement was executed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- M. O'Neil Supply Co. v. Petroleum Heat & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Pappenheim v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Herman v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Kane v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Post v. Metropolitan Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Thomas v. Cilbe, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Davis v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Brearton v. Fina, New York County Courts1956
- Davis v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1970