Legal Opinion

Atchley v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1940PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. Justice, Chambliss

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The question is presented for the first time whether or not power is conferred by Chapter 76, of the Acts of 1931, Williams’ Code, 11802.1 et seq., on the trial judge to grant a parole or suspension of sentence at a term subsequent to that when the conviction is finally adjudged.

Prior to the passage of this Act of 1931 judges had no such power to parole or to suspend a sentence (Spencer v. State, 125 Tenn., 64, 140 S. W., 597, 38 L. R. A (N. S.), 680), as is conferred by this Act. Being, therefore, in derogation of the common law, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spencer v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Stanley v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Linder v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McGuire v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Hethcoat v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Wilson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Moss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API