Legal Opinion

Torr v. Torr

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLouis L. Friedman, J.

Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint herein on the ground that (1) the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action, and (2) that plaintiff has failed to allege facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Two causes of action are alleged in the complaint. In the first, plaintiff seeks to set aside a conveyance of real property made by the deceased during his lifetime, to himself and the defendant herein, upon the ground that she was an alimony creditor at the time of such conveyance, and that as such, the conveyance was a fraud as to her. In her second cause, she…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kahler v. SearlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  2. Leitman v. LeitmanNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Mariner Harbor National Bank v. Imperial Beverage Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  4. Gough v. FrostNew York Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gordon v. GordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Mark v. SafrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Berkowitz v. BerkowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API