Legal Opinion
Colonial Bank v. Ridley & Schweigert
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided September 22, 1989No. 88-928, 88-970PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The accounting firm of Ridley Schweigert ("Ridley"), was employed by Leedy Mortgage Company, Inc. ("Leedy"), to audit financial statements for its fiscal years ending April 30, 1979, 1980, and 1981. In 1982, the accounting firm of Jamison, Money, Farmer Company ("Jamison"), replaced Ridley and audited financial statements for Leedy for the fiscal years ending April 30, 1982 and 1983. The annual financial statements were audited by Ridley and Jamison at Leedy's request only, and, although Leedy was provided with multiple copies of each year's audit, neither Ridley nor Jamison was requested to,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- White v. GuarenteNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Carl Legg v. WyethCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Armstrong Business Services, Inc. v. AmSouth BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Hines v. Riverside Chevrolet-Olds, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Walpert, Smullian & Blumenthal, P.A. v. KatzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.