Sanders Co. Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. City of Independence
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NUGENT, Judge.
The jury found in plaintiff’s favor on two counts for misrepresentation based upon a contract to build a sewer and a change order adopted regarding that construction. The trial court granted the defendant municipality a judgment notwithstanding the verdict on both counts. We reverse, reinstate the verdict on Count II, and remand for new trial with directions on Count III.
Plaintiff, Sanders Company Plumbing and Heating, contends that the court erred in upsetting the jury’s verdict in its favor and entering judgment for the defendant, City of Independence. In reviewing the court’s…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Christie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. Atlantic Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- St. Joseph Hospital v. Corbetta Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Missouri Consolidated Health Care Plan v. Community Health PlanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Damon Pursell Construction Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Murphy v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Penzel Constr. Co. v. Jackson R-2 Sch. Dist., Warner-Nease-Bost Architects & Henthorn, Sandmeyer & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Feely v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.