Legal Opinion · Concurrence

S & D GROUP, INC. v. Talamas

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided April 17, 1986No. 13-85-304-CVPublished

1ConcurrenceNye, Chief Justice

I respectfully concur with the majority’s opinion in this cause. However, I find the majority’s disposition of appellants’ third point of error, and subsequently, our judgment, to be incomplete. In sustaining appellants’ third point of error, the majority held that the appellant was entitled to a refund of the $12,000.00 security deposit. While I agree with the return of the deposit, I believe that under the pleadings in this cause, and the record before us, the recovery was based on the contractual relationship between the parties arising out of the lease agreement. In this regard, our…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commagere v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API