Amo v. Little Rapids Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Mercure, J. P.
(dissenting). We respectfully dissent. According to plaintiffs version of the events giving rise to the action, while operating a jackhammer on top of a large rock, plaintiff “slipped, and [his] right toe became lodged between the rock and the trench around the backside of the hardpan”. With his foot thus immobilized, plaintiffs body swung around toward the front of the rock and he fell back into the hole, striking the sloping side of the rock before being “caught” by a co-worker and thus prevented from coming in contact with the floor of the excavation. As acknowledged by the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Rodriguez v. Margaret Tietz Center for Nursing Care, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Ozzimo v. H.E.S., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Bradshaw v. National Structures, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.