Legal Opinion

Harruff v. King

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 14, 2014No. 13-940PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEATY, Judge.

I,Defendants appeal the judgment of the trial court rescinding the sale of immovable property on the basis of lesion beyond moiety. For the reasons set forth herein, we reverse.

ISSUE

This case presents the question of whether Louisiana law allows for the inclusion of the speculative value of mineral interests or rights in and to immovable property in determining the fair market value of such property for the purpose of rescinding the sale of the property on the basis of lesion beyond moiety.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiffs, Tammy Renea Martin Harruff and Amy Lynn Bilodeau…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Louisiana State Bar Association v. EdwinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  3. Cormier v. ComeauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  4. Wilkins v. NelsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  5. Fernandez v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Richard v. RichardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Williams v. Parish of St. BernardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Williams v. Opportunity Homes Ltd. PartnershipLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Harris v. Olivier's ContractorsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Harruff v. KingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API