Legal Opinion

Hacienda Mexican Restaurants of Kalamazoo Corp. v. Hacienda Franchise Group, Inc.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 1992No. Docket 137161PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal as of right the trial court’s January 7, 1991, award to the defendants of summary disposition based on the doctrine of forum non conveniens. We find no error and affirm.

All individual parties to this action are Indiana residents. The corporate parties are Indiana corporations having their principal offices in Indiana and are authorized to do business in Michigan. Plaintiff Hacienda Mexican Restaurants of Kalamazoo Corporation, as franchisee, and defendant Hacienda Franchise Group, Inc., as franchisor, negotiated ánd entered into an agreement in Indiana, authorizing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cray v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Holme v. Jason's LoungeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ward's Equipment, Inc. v. New Holland North America, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1997
  2. Miller v. Allied Signal, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Pitcairn Franchise Development, LLC v. JTH Tax LLC d/b/a/ Liberty Tax ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
  4. Pitcairn Franchise Development, LLC v. JTH Tax LLC d/b/a/ Liberty Tax ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API