Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Shell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 3, 1892PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Before Hudson] J., Laurens, October, 1891. •In this case Mr. Justice Pope, having been of counsel, did not sit. It was an action by Hewlett Sullivan, continued in the name of J. P. and J. H. Latimer, as his executors, against Gr. W. Shell, as clerk of court. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice McIver.

At the sale of the real estate of one M. A. Sullivan, under a bill to marshal the assets of his estate, the original plaintiff, Hewlett Sullivan, bid off a tract of land, and to secure the payment of the purchase money executed his bond and mortgage on the same. This bond remaining unpaid, proceedings to foreclose the mortgage were instituted by the clerk of the court, who had succeeded to the possession of the bond and mortgage, and on the 21st of February, 1877, a judgment was rendered against said Hewlett Sullivan for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gillam v. ArnoldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
  2. Schroder v. EasonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1820

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. BOWEN v. SAVOYSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
  2. Center v. CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  3. Poston v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  4. Sarratt v. Gaffney City Carpet Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  5. Rutledge v. Junior Order of United American MechanicsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API