Legal Opinion

People v. Hudson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 12, 2012PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*490The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). This case escalated from a shoplifting into a robbery when a codefendant used force to retain stolen merchandise. The testimony and surveillance videotape support the inference that defendant physically interfered, or tried to interfere, with the store manager’s efforts to recover the property from the codefendant, and that in doing so defendant intentionally participated in the codefendant’s use of force.

The court, which instructed the jury…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. People v. DaddonaNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. People v. RoldanNew York Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. BartonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API