Legal Opinion

Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Young

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the district court for Cass county. Tried below before Chapman, J. cited: Mood v. Ry., 22 Conn., 1. Burtis v. Buffalo, do., Ry., 24 N. Y., 269. Root v. G. W. Ry., 45 N. Y., 525. Grover & Baker Seioing Machine Co. v. Mo. Pac. Ry., 70 Mo., 672. • Erie Ry Co. v. Wilcox, 84 111., 239. York •County v. Cent. R. R., 3 Wall., 107. St. Louis & I. M. R. R. v. Lamed, 103 111., 293. Irish v. Mil. & St. Paul Ry., 19 Minn., 376. Angle v. M. & M. Ry.

Read the full summary

Error to the district court for Cass county. Tried below before Chapman, J. cited: Mood v. Ry., 22 Conn., 1. Burtis v. Buffalo, do., Ry., 24 N. Y., 269. Root v. G. W. Ry., 45 N. Y., 525. Grover & Baker Seioing Machine Co. v. Mo. Pac. Ry., 70 Mo., 672. • Erie Ry Co. v. Wilcox, 84 111., 239. York •County v. Cent. R. R., 3 Wall., 107. St. Louis & I. M. R. R. v. Lamed, 103 111., 293. Irish v. Mil. & St. Paul Ry., 19 Minn., 376. Angle v. M. & M. Ry. Co., 9 Iowa, 488. McDonald v. West. R. R. Cor., 34 N. Y., 497. Ortt v. M. & St. L. Ry. Go., 31 N. W. R., 519. Bancroft v. Merchants’ Des. Co., 47…

1Opinion of the Court

Reese, Ch. J.

Defendant in en’or delivered to plaintiff in error, at Weeping Water, a piano, to be transported from Weeping Water to Louisville and “ delivered to a connecting common carrier,” to be conveyed thence to Plattsmouth. The piano was presented to the agent of the Burlington & *653Missouri River Railroad Co. at Louisville, who declined to receive it, owing to its having been damaged.

It is shown by the evidence that the piano was received by plaintiff in error and transported to its station at. Louisville, which was at a point on its line where, its road. crossed the track of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hooper v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. M. Lewis & Sons v. Illinois Cent. R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Goodman v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Model Clothing Co. v. Columbia Transfer Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API