Legal Opinion

Shalter v. Caldwell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1866PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from the Tippecanoe Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

Caldwell sued Shalter on a promissory note. The suit was commenced December 31,1866. The appellant answered in two paragraphs,'the first of which was withdrawn. The appellee demurred to the second paragraph because it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a defense, which demurrer was sustained and final judgment rendered thereon. The sustaining of this demurrer is the error complained of. The second paragraph sets forth, “that before suit was commenced the plaintiff was indebted to one Samuel O. Fowler on an account, a copy of which is made a part of the answer, in the sum of $1,294…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Duck v. AbbottIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Page v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API