Sweeney v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Defendant’s petition for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtStiness, J.
By the terms of the policies of insurance issued by the defendant the answers and statements in the printed and written applications for the policies are made a part of the contract; the applicant declares and warrants that the representations and answers made are strictly correct and wholly true; that they shall form the basis and become part of the contract of insurance if any be issued, and that any untrue answer will render the policy void.
Whether statements which obviously cannot lie within the knowledge of the applicant, and which both parties must know are to be given upon information…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Continental Life Insurance v. RogersIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Jeffries v. Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Piedmont, Etc. Life-Ins. Co. v. Ewing, Etc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Cobb v. Covenant Mutual Benefit Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Spencer v. Citizens' Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hennessy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- Ley v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1905