Legal Opinion
Bundo v. Liquor Control Commission
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided August 20, 1979No. Docket 78-2272, 78-2744PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P.J.
Are rules of the Michigan Liquor Control Commission prohibiting topless and bottomless dancing valid, constitutional exercise^ of *23the state’s police power or do they violate the First or Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution? The trial court held such rules valid and plaintiffs appeal of right.
Plaintiffs are the owners and operators of the Camelot Inn in the city of Walled Lake, Oakland County, Michigan, an establishment licensed to sell liquor by the glass by the Michigan Liquor Control Commission. On October 14, 1977, the Liquor Control Commission adopted rules and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Erznoznik v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- California v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Jenkins v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Noey v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Oakland County v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matter of Ratcliff Enterprises, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1984
- Andriacchi's, Inc. v. Pike (In Re Pike)District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1986
- Bundo v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Stanich v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980