Legal Opinion

Allen v. Kansas City Fibre Box Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 11, 1926No. 27,010PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.':

This was an action for compensation for an injury to a finger sustained by plaintiff while employed in defendant’s factory.

Defendant pleaded a settlement and release, to which plaintiff replied that he could neither read nor write, that he was over sixty years of age and had no education, and that defendant’s officers had led him to believe he was merely making his mark on a voucher for two weeks’ compensation. He further replied that he was not advised that he was signing a release, nor had he any intention to do so, and that any such…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gailey v. Peet Bros. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Sauvain v. BattelleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Chance v. Reliance Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  4. Dennis v. CaffertySupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. Tucker v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HoageCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  2. Brown v. Dittman-Wachter Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  3. Harris v. Southwestern Milling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Shumona v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API