Legal Opinion

Matter of Roberts-Hohl

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1994No. 21724PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

866 P.2d 1167 (1994)

116 N.M. 700

In the Matter of Winston ROBERTS-HOHL, An Attorney Admitted to Practice Before the Courts of the State of New Mexico.

No. 21724.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

January 6, 1994.

Virginia L. Ferrara, Chief Disciplinary Counsel, Albuquerque, for disciplinary Bd.

Winston Roberts-Hohl, pro se.

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

OPINION

2Per curiam

This matter is before the Court following disciplinary proceedings conducted pursuant to the Rules of Governing Discipline, SCRA 1986, 17-101 through 17-306 (Repl.Pamp. 1991 & Cum.Supp. 1993), wherein the disciplinary board recommended that attorney…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Matter of TapiaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Matter of AllredNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  4. In re RobertshohlNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rangel v. Save Mart, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Rio Grande Sun v. Jemez Mountains Pub. Sch. Dist.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Rio Grande Sun v. Jemez Mountains Public School DistrictNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Matter of KrobNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Matter of OrdazNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API