Thompkin v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm appellant’s conviction but reverse his sentence and remand for resen-tencing. The trial court’s order pursuant to section 39.111(7), Florida Statutes (1989) was deficient in addressing all of the statutory criteria. In particular, with respect to criterion 4, addressing the juvenile’s sophistication and maturity, the sole reference to past criminal behavior without addressing the other statutory criteria listed in section 39.111(7)(c)4 is inadequate. Flowers v. State, 546 So.2d 782 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Posey v. State, 501 So.2d 192 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). See also Martin v. State, 547…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Mays v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Martin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Posey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Beasley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Mancini v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992