Arnold Chew v. City & County of San Francisco
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Plaintiff-Appellant Arnold Chew appeals the decision by the district court 1 granting the motion for summary judgment brought by Defendants-Appellees City and County of San Francisco (collectively, the “City”) and Laguna Honda Hospital (“LHH”). Plaintiff also appeals from related eviden-tiary rulings and from the award of costs. 2 The underlying claims arise from Plaintiffs employment with LHH, which is owned by the City. Plaintiff alleged discrimination and retaliation based on his association with an African-American colleague in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Devereaux v. AbbeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hodges v. Hertz Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- (PS) Brown v. U.S. Air ForceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- (PS) Lentz v. BernhardtDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- (PS) Singh v. AustinDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Benno v. BosenkoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.