Sanborn v. Sturtevant
Supreme Court of Minnesota
After a trial by jury and verdict for tbe plaintiff at a general term of tbe district court for Mille Lac county, the defendant Sturtevant moved for a new trial upon a bill of exceptions, and appeals to this court from the order denying such motion. Tbe case is fully stated in tbe opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
*202 By the Court.
McMillan, J.
This is an action of trespass quare clausum fregit.
The complaint avers that, at the time of the alleged trespasses, the plaintiff was the owner in fee, and in the actual and legal possession of the locus in quo, consisting of several governmental subdivisions of land, described in the complaint according to the government survey; that the defendants and each of them, acting in concert and aiding and encouraging each other, unlawfully, wrongfully, forcibly and wilfully entered upon the premises, and cut down, broke down, removed, and took and carried away, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wall v. OsbornNew York Supreme Court · 1834
- Van Eman v. StanchfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
- Coit v. WaplesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1854
3Cited by10 opinions
- Merriam v. Pine City Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- Burch v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Blackberry, Ky. W. v. C. C. Co. v. K'ntl'd C. C.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Blackberry, Kentucky & West Virginia Coal & Coke Co. v. Kentland Coal & Coke Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1928
- National Car & Locomotive Builder v. Cyclone Steam Snow Plow Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.