Legal Opinion

Commercial Laundries, Inc. v. Eureka Housing Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 20, 2000No. 3D00-1069PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Because genuine material issues remain for appropriate resolution, including but not necessarily limited to questions of standing, implied actual notice of the interests of the tenant, see Lee County Bank v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 126 So.2d 589 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961); Bodden v. Carbonell, 354 So.2d 927 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978), and laches, see City of Miami v. Carter, 105 So.2d 5 (Fla.1958); City of Miami v. Gates, 393 So.2d 586 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), review denied, 402 So.2d 608 (Fla.1981), the summary judgment reforeclosing the appellant’s leasehold is reversed for further proceedings.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Miami v. CarterSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  2. City of Miami v. GatesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Lee County Bank v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  4. Bodden v. CarbonellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wood v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000